SECTION 11.0

Simon India

Technology Selection

Comparative evaluation of three key technology licensors — MECS, NIUIF, and Chemetics — with detailed process parameters, consumption rates, and environmental performance data.

Select Technology Licensor

Technology License & Know-How

₹27.00 Cr

Proprietary Items Cost

NIL

Impact on Total EPC

No Additional Cost

Toggle between licensors to see the impact on proprietary item costs. This selection flows through to Cost Summary and Sensitivity Analysis pages.

11.1 Key Technology Licensors

MECS (DuPont)

USA

Pros

Repeat licensor for PPL — proven relationship

Cons

Cost of Proprietary Items & Catalyst

NIUIF

Russia

Pros

Cost Efficient and least proprietary equipment
Indigenous Manufacturing — local sourcing advantage

Cons

Russian Technology established in CIS region only

Chemetics

Canada

Pros

Efficient technology — strong process performance

Cons

Cost of Proprietary Equipments
Maintenance Spares — single-source dependency

11.2 NIUIF vs MECS — Detailed Comparison

ParameterNIUIFMECSVerdict
Capacity (TPD)up to 1,500up to 1,500Equal
FlowsheetDC-DADC-DAEqual
Converter Beds54–5Equal
SO₂ Inlet Concentration11.5–12.0%11.5–12.0%Equal
Total Conversion Rate99.82–99.86%99.82–99.86%Equal
Dried Air Moisturemax 0.01%max 0.01%Equal
Product Concentration92.5–98.0%92.5–98.0%Equal
Sulphur Consumption0.328 t/t0.328 t/tEqual

11.3 Performance Guarantees

ParameterGuaranteed ValueTest Method
Plant Capacity3,000 MTPD of 98% H₂SO₄72-hour continuous run
SO₂ Conversion> 99.86% (benchmark)Orsat analysis / online analyzer
Stack SO₂ Emission< 0.5 kg/ton H₂SO₄Stack emission monitoring
Acid Mist Emission< 30 mg/Nm³Isokinetic sampling
HP Steam Generation> 1.2 T steam / T acidSteam flow measurement
Sulphur Consumption< 0.34 T sulphur / T acidWeigh bridge / flow meter
Power Consumption< 45 kWh/T acid (excl. TG)Energy meter

11.4 Simon India — Technology Coordination

Evaluated by Multiple Licensors

Simon India Engineering has been evaluated by Ballestra, Chemetics, and NIUIF and is in the process of licensing engagements. This positions SIL to work with whichever technology licensor PPL selects, ensuring seamless EPC execution regardless of the technology choice.

Availability of domain experts on tap for immediate resolution
Alternate Technology Partners evaluated and available
Proven execution of 2,000 TPD SAP with MECS technology for PPL
In-house process engineering team with DCDA expertise
Strong vendor relationships across all three licensor ecosystems
Flexible approach — technology-agnostic EPC capability