SECTION 19.0

Simon India

Manpower Histogram

Workforce deployment plan across the 24-month EPC timeline, showing trade-wise buildup from engineering mobilization through construction peak to commissioning demobilization.

523

Peak Manpower

Month 13

6,506

Total Man-Months

Across 24 months

24

Total Trades

Across 4 categories

~2.5M

Est. Man-Hours

@ 26 days × 10 hrs

Manpower Deployment — Stacked Histogram

Engineering
Construction
Commissioning
Support
5233922621310

M1: 33 persons

Engineering: 26

Support: 7

M2: 44 persons

Engineering: 37

Support: 7

M3: 49 persons

Engineering: 42

Support: 7

M4: 51 persons

Engineering: 44

Support: 7

M5: 121 persons

Engineering: 44

Construction: 60

Support: 17

M6: 186 persons

Engineering: 44

Construction: 120

Support: 22

M7: 260 persons

Engineering: 38

Construction: 195

Support: 27

M8: 330 persons

Engineering: 38

Construction: 260

Support: 32

M9: 384 persons

Engineering: 35

Construction: 315

Support: 34

M10: 444 persons

Engineering: 35

Construction: 375

Support: 34

M11: 489 persons

Engineering: 30

Construction: 425

Support: 34

M12: 509 persons

Engineering: 30

Construction: 445

Support: 34

M13: 523 persons

Engineering: 29

Construction: 460

Support: 34

M14: 518 persons

Engineering: 29

Construction: 455

Support: 34

M15: 484 persons

Engineering: 27

Construction: 425

Support: 32

M16: 456 persons

Engineering: 27

Construction: 395

Commissioning: 2

Support: 32

M17: 405 persons

Engineering: 21

Construction: 348

Commissioning: 9

Support: 27

M18: 344 persons

Engineering: 21

Construction: 280

Commissioning: 16

Support: 27

M19: 257 persons

Engineering: 20

Construction: 186

Commissioning: 30

Support: 21

M20: 204 persons

Engineering: 20

Construction: 118

Commissioning: 45

Support: 21

M21: 160 persons

Engineering: 17

Construction: 73

Commissioning: 55

Support: 15

M22: 125 persons

Engineering: 17

Construction: 43

Commissioning: 50

Support: 15

M23: 84 persons

Engineering: 13

Construction: 25

Commissioning: 35

Support: 11

M24: 46 persons

Engineering: 12

Construction: 5

Commissioning: 20

Support: 9

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Month from Contract Award →

Manpower Buildup Phases

Mobilization

M1–M4 | 25–50

Engineering team deployment at HO. Site office setup. Preliminary civil survey.

Ramp-Up

M5–M9 | 50–450

Civil works commence. Structural erection starts. Fabrication yard operational. Welders and fitters mobilized.

Peak Construction

M10–M16 | 600–830

All trades deployed simultaneously. Equipment erection, piping, E&I in parallel. Maximum crane utilization.

Demobilization

M17–M24 | 830→50

Progressive release of construction trades. Commissioning team takes over. Punch-list closure. PG test.

Engineering

44

Peak persons

6 trades | 696 man-months

Construction

460

Peak persons

12 trades | 5008 man-months

Commissioning

55

Peak persons

2 trades | 262 man-months

Support

34

Peak persons

4 trades | 540 man-months

Note: Manpower numbers are indicative and based on similar 3,000 TPD SAP projects executed by Simon India. Actual deployment will be optimized during detailed construction planning. Subcontractor manpower is included in respective trade categories. Accommodation and transport arrangements will be finalized based on local availability.

19.2Project S-Curve — Planned Progress

The S-Curve represents cumulative planned progress (%) across the 24-month EPC timeline. Discipline-wise weightages are assigned based on cost proportion and effort distribution. Actual progress can be overlaid during execution for earned value tracking.

Overall Project — Cumulative Planned Progress

Weight: 100% (all disciplines)
100%75%50%25%0%

Month 1

Planned: 0.4%

Incremental: 0.4%

Month 2

Planned: 1.3%

Incremental: 0.9%

Month 3

Planned: 3.0%

Incremental: 1.6%

Month 4

Planned: 5.3%

Incremental: 2.3%

Month 5

Planned: 8.7%

Incremental: 3.4%

Month 6

Planned: 13.1%

Incremental: 4.5%

Month 7

Planned: 19.0%

Incremental: 5.8%

Month 8

Planned: 25.7%

Incremental: 6.7%

Month 9

Planned: 32.9%

Incremental: 7.2%

Month 10

Planned: 40.2%

Incremental: 7.3%

Month 11

Planned: 47.5%

Incremental: 7.3%

Month 12

Planned: 55.0%

Incremental: 7.5%

Month 13

Planned: 62.2%

Incremental: 7.2%

Month 14

Planned: 68.9%

Incremental: 6.7%

Month 15

Planned: 74.9%

Incremental: 6.0%

Month 16

Planned: 80.0%

Incremental: 5.1%

Month 17

Planned: 84.8%

Incremental: 4.8%

Month 18

Planned: 88.5%

Incremental: 3.8%

Month 19

Planned: 91.8%

Incremental: 3.3%

Month 20

Planned: 94.3%

Incremental: 2.5%

Month 21

Planned: 96.6%

Incremental: 2.3%

Month 22

Planned: 98.1%

Incremental: 1.6%

Month 23

Planned: 99.1%

Incremental: 1.0%

Month 24

Planned: 99.6%

Incremental: 0.5%

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Month from Contract Award →

25% Progress

Month 8

50% Progress

Month 12

75% Progress

Month 16

95% Progress

Month 21

Earned Value Tracking

The above weightages form the baseline for Earned Value Management (EVM) during project execution. Actual progress will be measured against these planned values to compute Schedule Performance Index (SPI) and Cost Performance Index (CPI). Monthly progress reports will overlay actual S-Curve on the planned baseline to identify deviations early and trigger corrective actions.

BCWS

Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled

Planned % × Budget

BCWP

Budgeted Cost of Work Performed

Actual % × Budget

SPI

Schedule Performance Index

BCWP / BCWS

CPI

Cost Performance Index

BCWP / ACWP